.
Feedback

Video: Israel Speaks Out on Debt Talks

Rep. Steve Israel criticizes 'extremists' blocking action.

Rep., D-Huntington, criticized Republicans Saturday for walking away from talks with President Obama over the national debt ceiling.

Calling out "extremist Republicans in the House," Israel laid the current crisis at their doorstep.

“They are willing to take this economy to the brink in pursuit of their extreme agenda that supports corporate tax loopholes instead of middle class budgets,” the Democrat said.

He spoke out at an event on the benefits of a federal energy program at a home in Huntington Station.

Israel is chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Plainview Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Jonathan Dees July 24, 2011 at 07:35 pm
Too many people rely on the government to take care of them. This country has become more and more of a nanny state, especially since Obama became president. Once people start getting the handouts, it's pretty hard to give them up. People at the top see this and get very frustrated as they continue support all these entitlements and government largess. I don't blame the outrage. We have to take care of needy people, yes. But When Obama expands government to huge levels, when state and local governments continue to give outlandish benefits to government, municipal and educational workers, when illegals get government assistance, when abortions are funded by the government, when health insurance becomes a federal mandate, when drug addicts receive food stamps, when people live longer and get more out of entitlement benefits than what they paid into them, then we get the TEA party and an outraged silent majority. Consider me the latter.
Dylan Skolnick July 24, 2011 at 07:53 pm
Medicare and Medicaid are two of the best things ever done by the federal government. However, we are told that these programs are very nice but we can't afford them, and the only option is to cut them. This is false. The real threat to these programs is the skyrocketing cost of health care. What is needed is a powerful effort to slow that escalation down. The Democrats' extremely watered-down heath-care reform bill took some timid steps in that direction, but much more work is needed. The extremely powerful health industry lobby has consistently blocked those efforts, but we need to keep pushing for more and better health coverage. Social Security is in a similar situation. This so-called "crisis" is largely manufactured. The system is solvent for many years to come, and with some fairly minor tweaks could be made solvent indefinitely. The current "crisis" is just an excuse to gut the program. The idea that these programs turn America into a "nanny state" is absurd. This is simply a safety net to protect people from the very worst disasters of life (catastrophic illness, unemployment, and the financial risks of old age). "People at the top (aka the very rich) may be frustrated," but that's no excuse for causing immense destruction in the lives of the middle-class and poor. Government has actually been shrinking in recent years, which has added to our high unemployment. Instead of cutting support to the needy, we should be ending crazy subsidies to big business.
Jerry Hannon July 24, 2011 at 09:22 pm
Once again I see so many people writing who obviously worship at the altar of Ayn Rand, and her late Twentieth Century apostles.
If you have the cash, then you are fine, and you can take care of yourself for medical needs and for retirement. Lost your job, too bad. Got cancer, too bad. Have a permanently disabled child, too bad. Your child has a high fever, too bad. You worked for Enron, and your retirement "fund" was invested in Enron stock, and the company executives lied and cheated, and you lost everything, too bad. Suffer from hallucinations or crippling phobias, and can no longer work, too bad. You lived to be ninety years old, and have gone through all of your retirement savings, too bad. “Then they themselves also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not take care of You?’ 45“Then He will answer them, ‘Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’"
Jonathan Dees July 24, 2011 at 10:43 pm
Jerry - you're focusing on extreme cases which most people want to take care of. Nobody wants to end unemployment benefits, medicare, medicaid or social security. But they need to be reformed, and you know it. Paul makes great points about the free market, but try telling Obama about that. But let's face it, the more you give to people, the more they take. What happened to personal responsibility? But the size of government isn't limited to entitlements, which are very big of course. But what about people who work for the government? I didn't see you address that in your rebuttal. If you think benefits paid to government workers are ok, you're mistaken. All of these bloated, overlapping, unnecessary bureaucracies and the huge benefits paid to these workers are draining tax dollars from taxpayers. They're totally out of line with the private sector - you can't tell me you agree with that. These budgetary issues have to be addressed as well. If you want to just raise taxes and keep all government programs the same, good luck. Who is John Galt, BTW, Jerry?
Jerry Hannon July 25, 2011 at 03:22 am
You can stop cancer by killing the patient; however, the sensible person wants to both stop the cancer from spreading, and have the patient survive.
We need adjustments in our spending, just as we need adjustments in our revenue generation. Both the Simpson-Bowles Commission (formal title: The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform), as well as the Domenici-Rivlin Task Force (formal title: Bipartisan Policy Center’s Debt Reduction Task Force) have made that clear to all whose eyes and ears and minds are open. These were both bipartisan groups, indeed the latter task force was formed by an organization whose principal founders were 2 very prominent Republicans (Sen Dole & Sen. Baker), and 2 very prominent Democrats (Sen. Daschle & Sen. Mitchell). But, step #1, without which we cascade down mercilessly, is to get the US Debt Limit re-set. Playing chicken with our future is no way to govern responsibly, and indeed would take us into uncharted waters. The US Congress, under every President in modern history, Republican or Democrat, has done the responsible thing, and authorized our national debt level to provide maneuvering room for our government. Once the genie of default is out of the bottle, it cannot be put back into the bottle as if nothing bad happened. We would be forever, and irretrievably, affected.
Jerry Hannon July 25, 2011 at 03:40 am
Now, as to compensation for public sector employees, yes, I do believe that compensation levels should be studied and if it is demonstrated -- by objective analysis -- that the compensation is out of line with private sector compensation for similar responsibilities, then steps should be taken to address such imbalances.
In some cases, I expect the studies to find that some categories of public sector employees are under-compensated, while others are in reasonable range, and yet others are significantly over-compensated. But, all of that has nothing to do with extending the debt limit! However, the borrowing costs for the federal government -- and by derivation, since that becomes the baseline, the borrowing costs for you, and me, and anyone buying a house, or a car, or using loans to pay for a child's college expenses -- will spike dramatically if this asinine Congress keeps playing games. That will then further depress an already-depressed housing market, and kill car sales, and send the economy from this severe recession into a second Great Depression. And, once S&P and Moody's cut the US from AAA/Aaa to AA/Aa2 or even AA-/Aa3 (I would expect at least a two grade move), it will take years to regain the top grade; the negative impact will last longer than the political career of some of those clowns playing brinksmanship.
Steve July 25, 2011 at 04:03 am
Coup d'état (Fr., stroke of state), an attempt to change a government by the threat or use of force, usually but not always associated with the military, ...
The Republicans are high jacking the country, it's no longer about the people, it's all about special interest and protecting corporate America at any cost including the welfare of the people. It's really sad and rather frightening..but if we are to believe what they say...trickel down economics will insure the corporations see that we get our fair share...um hum
Steve July 25, 2011 at 04:11 am
Moody's should be out of business and why anyone would use Moody's to rate anything after they looked the otherway on billions, maybe Trillions of Mortgage back securities that led us to where we are today is beyound me. Again the Fox guarding the Hen house....I would trust a republican made the phone call to Moodys to put out the press release.....
Dylan Skolnick July 25, 2011 at 04:32 am
A free market in health insurance is exactly what got us into this mess. Health Insurance companies suck massive amounts of profits out of our health care expenditures. If we had a government-run single-payer health system, that money would stay in the system and bring down costs.
Dylan Skolnick July 25, 2011 at 04:58 am
No mainstream politician says they want to end unemployment benefits, medicare, medicaid or social security. Instead, they just "reform" them, which turns out to be a euphemism for cutting them until they shrivel and end.
Enos Frederick July 25, 2011 at 11:46 am
Dylan and Steve: Keep writing. You are both saying the very right things for millions of us. We need your kind of help in what's going on now with repubs putting up offers to stall or hold hostages until they get their way. They know no reasonable person would accept their offers as made som far.
Louise July 25, 2011 at 12:28 pm
Enos, I'm with you on this one. Both Dylan and Steve have given voice to the legions of us who are tired of the them vs. us games in Congress. Dylan and Steve make their arguments with intelligence and without a lot of emotion. Let's tell our so-called representatives to do their jobs and stop the self-serving rhetoric
Jonathan Dees July 25, 2011 at 01:06 pm
Louise - I think you need to re-read Dylan and Steve's posts again. Intelligence? How about some facts. Look at Dylan's two posts above, and tell me if he's not spouting rhetoric instead of facts. I know you're on his side, but don't make his comments out to be anything but opposition to the other side with meaningless rants against his way of thinking.
Jack July 25, 2011 at 04:22 pm
The only extremists are Obama and his lackys like Israel. If it were not for the Republicans, these clowns would still be on their spending binge. Under Obama we are adding $4.6 BILLION PER DAY to the deficit. THAT'S PER DAY. As a comparison, under Bush we were adding $1.5 BILLION PER DAY which is also unacceptable but you can see the huge difference between the two. This issue was put on the table by the Republicans and the Tea Party with no mention prior by the likes of Israel. To make it worse as Israel continues his lies, it's Obama who keeps moving his demands to the left and not he other way around.
Jerry Hannon July 25, 2011 at 04:34 pm
"As for the ratings downgrade, the agencies have said we may be downgraded anyway."
You are comparing apples to eggs. Yes, the spending has to decrease and the revenue generation has to increase; that was the tentative deal -- which we and the markets were waiting for late last week -- that Mr. Boehner walked out on, despite the fact that President Obama had even pissed off most of his party by agreeing to three times as much spending cuts as revenue increases. As to whether you, or anyone else posting, likes or dislikes Moody's and S&P, the reality is that their debt ratings do determine borrowing costs; they also determine how much of a particular class of debt may be held by pension funds, public and private, as well as by national treasuries (i.e., other nations who are cash rich and invest outside their borders, and such nations as China, and Japan, and the UK hold huge amounts of US debt.) That ratings limitation test could cause US debt to be dumped on the markets, further driving up interest rates. if the US does not reauthorize its debt requirements, and the ratings agencies cut US debt ratings, it will increase our national interest burden, and it will increase our personal interest burden, regardless of whether someone likes or dislikes Moody's. Reality sucks, doesn't it? However, it beats delusion, because the delusional can't (or choose not to) understand what is about to happen to the US, and to each of us personally.
Jerry Hannon July 25, 2011 at 04:45 pm
By the way, the latest tactic by the radical extremists of the Republican Party (of which I used to be proud, as a lifelong Republican), is to push for a short-term debt limit increase.
That is absurd, and it won't calm the markets. We need an immediate long-term increase in the debt limit, and that must be followed up by serious negotiations for deficit reduction in accordance with both the Simpson-Bowles commission, as well as the Bipartisan Policy Center's Domenici-Rivlin Task Force. At least there are some responsible adults trying to educate those with their heads in the sand, or worse.
Jerry Hannon July 25, 2011 at 05:58 pm
Sorry, paul, but that 400 billion dollars of which you speak is not going to stifle job creation; it's going to further reduce the national debt by having the super-super-wealthy take home a bit less by closing tax loopholes.
This "job killing" line from the radical right is simply male bovine manure. And, yes, I know that the Tea Party faction of the Republicans in the House does not want any revenue increases; but it's also true that the left wing faction of the Democrats in the House don't want any spending cuts. But, I'm not interested, and the super-majority of the American people are not interested, in the rantings and ravings of the lunatic fringe, whether from the right or from the left. We need a responsible response, from the vast political center of both the GOP and the Democrats, and that is precisely what the Bipartisan Policy Center's Domenici-Rivlin Task Force proposed. The Bipartisan Policy Center, by the way, was founded by four former Senate Majority Leaders, two Republicans (Bob Dole and Howard Baker), and two Democrats (Tom Daschle and George Mitchell). We need more adults like them, and fewer mindless children like Eric Cantor or Michelle Bachman; these irresponsible political extremists, and their ilk, are ready to destroy the future of the United States, just for their own highly partisan and radical ideological views.
Louise July 25, 2011 at 06:13 pm
To each his own, Jonathan. You have every right to believe what you want, and so do I. In the meantime, I continue to be both informed and amused, sometimes dismayed, by the division this entire issue is exposing. Your criticism is just a small part of this conversation.
Jerry Hannon July 25, 2011 at 07:28 pm
Holy crap!
Delsuion compounded by distortion, and an inability to separate fact from Fox fiction. What a recipe for American disaster. But, why should facts get in the way of your objective of destroying President Obama; maybe you can call him a pedophile and a terrorist and a witch and a puppy-killer and a satanist and...what else would you like to throw in? I have as much use for people like you as I do for those who called Bush a war criminal or a fascist or monarchist or....well, let's relegate both extremes to the cesspool of deficient thinking.
Jerry Hannon July 25, 2011 at 07:28 pm
Holy crap!
Delsuion compounded by distortion, and an inability to separate fact from Fox fiction. What a recipe for American disaster. But, why should facts get in the way of your objective of destroying President Obama; maybe you can call him a pedophile and a terrorist and a witch and a puppy-killer and a satanist and...what else would you like to throw in? I have as much use for people like you as I do for those who called Bush a war criminal or a fascist or monarchist or....well, let's relegate both extremes to the cesspool of deficient thinking.
Louise July 25, 2011 at 07:38 pm
Anyone who continues to be baited by Paul is a sucker. Let him dwell in his own bit of paradise. Save your arguments for people who know how to read.
Jack July 25, 2011 at 09:18 pm
Loiuse F,
Actually, I had the same sentiment about you from your post yesterday where you begin, "Create jobs doing what?". That line alone but re-read the rest of what you posted tells me how you just don't get it. We have the largest corporate tax rate in the world forcing jobs off shore. We need to cut those rates in half and that alone will create hundred of thousands of domestic jobs and tax revenues to the Treasury. In addition, Clinton reduced deficits and balanced a budget during a time of great growth created by the private sector. It was a time when everyone (many for the first time) were buying all the new technologies in computers, cell phones, software, fax machines, etc...as well as all the upstart dot.com companies which created huge tax revenues flowing to the government. I give Clinton credit for not spending those surplus revenues during his time when he moved his idealogy to the center.
Steve July 25, 2011 at 09:51 pm
Oddly we vote these poeple into office and after one term they are guaranteed outstanding benefits for life....not a bad gig if you can get it! Yet they would prefer that the people who voted them in get nothing....How about we make a deal, I don't want anything more or less than my congressmen receives in benefits....whats good for the goose.....sounds fair to me!
Steve July 26, 2011 at 12:01 am
Paul is right, Tech bubble fixed many things....can make you look like a Geniuses....Like being the Manager of the Yankees!
Jonathan Dees July 26, 2011 at 01:15 am
All you have to do to see that Obama is playing politics with the debt ceiling is to watch his speech right now. Totally nauseating. This guy does not get it! He's totally pandering - I thought he'd come to his senses, but he's going right for the jugular - how dare he invoke Reagan in comparison! SS checks might not go out. What a liar!!! America continues to go down the tubes right in front of us with this hood from Chicago......
Jerry Hannon July 26, 2011 at 03:13 pm
Neither Boehner nor Reid, in yesterday's sorry revelations, had revenue enhancements in their deficient proposals. which is completely contrary to two bipartisan studies, one by the Simpson-Bowles Commission, and the other by the Domenici-Rivlin Task Force of the Bipartisan Policy Center, http://www.bipartisanpolicy.org/projects/debt-initiative/about.
Mayor Bloomberg hit the fiscal nail on the head when he said that tackling the federal deficit will require a combination of tax increases and spending cuts. Failure to enact both substantial spending cuts and revenue enhancements will first destroy the US debt rating, and that will immediately drive up consumer interest rates, kill the auto recovery, kill the housing market, kill even more jobs, and kill any possible recovery for the United States and its citizens.
Jonathan Dees July 26, 2011 at 05:25 pm
Paul - you're right on. I think the R's will sweep into the Senate and WH in 2012, which is what Mitch McConnell's main goal has been all along. Forgetting that the housing mess (which was caused by many guilty parties) dragged down the economy (which essentially gave BHO the Oval Office), and was brought down even more so by the D's ultimate desire to control and expand government and to keep longstanding power, the R's have to win back the two they don’t control to clean this mess up and give liberty back to the people instead of giving their liberty to the government. I can see Jerry interjecting that the R's caused it all, but Bush expanded revenues and reduced unemployment when he cut taxes. The prescription drug plan, and two necessary wars to keep us safe in the U.S. notwithstanding, the economy was brought to its knees by the D's desire to make sure everyone could live the American dream and own a home, and even more so by expanding government-run healthcare, not to mention owning an auto company, and paying off the unions with the “Stimulus.” Well, as the Wrong-Reverend-Wright once said, the chickens are coming home to roost.
Jonathan Dees July 26, 2011 at 08:11 pm
He can't help but to spew democratic talking points every time he opens his mouth. He's a total embarrassment to NY district #2. He was scolded recently on the "Morning Joe" show by the host himself for bringing his usual talking points (tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires, tax cuts for big oil, and on and on and on) onto the show instead of talking substance. Makes you wonder about the majority vote he gets around here - scary.
Louise July 26, 2011 at 09:51 pm
If you want to rip up the Constitution and start from scratch, there are a lot of other places on this earth that need you. You have every right to call this country names, be intolerant of other people's opinions, use an opinion column as a base to spew your hatred of the president, because you're an American. Try getting those rights anywhere else.
Louise July 27, 2011 at 12:50 am
This will be my last response on this topic. Your comments are destructive, not constructive. Period.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
George June 7, 2013 at 07:50 am
yes, found out the hard way at one of these traps in Hicksville.
Frank Oltep June 7, 2013 at 11:30 am
The definition of STOP in the driving world is " the complete cessation of movement".Read More Sound like many people think STOP signs mean 1. Slow To Observe Police or 2. Slightly Touch On (brake) pedal. Time to go to traffic school online at www.oltep.com. Relearn what you forgot from Driver's Ed. Stay Safe
A June 7, 2013 at 11:52 pm
Stop means stop. Just like stop signs, where it seems like the local definition is to slow down toRead More 30 mph. You STOP, and look. Then go. I have seen kids having a tough time crossing Jamaica Ave because of this twisted definition of STOP. If anything, this is a good way to relearn what should of been taught in drivers ed. When I moved to Plainview, people at a stop sign would signal the driver that got there first to go. Now it's a race to the stop sign and fly by it to avoid having the other guy go first.